corwin90 | Jan 24, 2013 12:07 am |
---|---|
Subject: Is Landing Pad the only building that "breaks" connectors Recently, I played a game and built a Landing Pad so I could repair/reload my fighters. I built the landing pad on top of a connector joining two halves of my base. I was quite surprised when my two base halves were now disconnected. The Landing Pad does not count as a connecting building. Is this the ONLY building that does this? I guess MAX considers a Landing Pad to be the same as either a road, water platform or bridge? Thanks! |
Eiko | Jan 24, 2013 9:58 am |
---|---|
Subject: Re: Is Landing Pad the only building that "breaks" connectors Yes, the landing pad is treated the same as roads, bridges and platforms. But I think it shouldn't delete a connector on the same field when building. On the other hand, a landing pad under a connector? How can a plane land there? So I'm not sure how the correct behaviour should be. What do the others think? |
beko | Jan 24, 2013 10:05 am |
---|---|
Subject: Re: Is Landing Pad the only building that "breaks" connectors Afair this behavior was implemented on purpose so it's perfectly fine. |
Eiko | Jan 24, 2013 10:39 am |
---|---|
Subject: Re: Is Landing Pad the only building that "breaks" connectors Yes, but it is an surprising behaviour, when you build a pad and suddenly you half base is disconnected. You wouldn't expect this. And there is no other building, that shows such a behaviour. Road, bridge and platform don't delete connectors (I hope). We agree, that a pad under a connector would be odd. But I suggest to disallow the building of the pad, instead of deleting the connector. |
beko | Jan 24, 2013 11:02 am |
---|---|
Subject: Re: Is Landing Pad the only building that "breaks" connectors How's that in the original? And buildings DO delete connectors. A building on a connector replaces the connector. |
Eiko | Jan 24, 2013 11:24 am |
---|---|
Subject: Re: Is Landing Pad the only building that "breaks" connectors Quote by beko: How's that in the original? Only buildings, that act as connector itself, delete connectors. It is not possible to divide the base, except with the landing pad. You're right, question is: what does the org MAX do? |
Sal | Jan 24, 2013 11:52 am |
---|---|
Subject: Re: Is Landing Pad the only building that "breaks" connectors I just checked the original MAX. You can build a landing pad on a connector. The moment the landing pad replaces the connector, all seems fine. When you want to end the turn, MAX needs to adjust the power/fuel . To sum it up. A landing pad deletes a connector and cuts off the remaining base parts, if it was the only one connector to the main base. For comparison , a concrete block acts also as a (strong) connector. |
|
Attachments: MAX0013.jpg (Filesize: 56.83 KB) MAX0015.jpg (Filesize: 55.46 KB) MAX0017.jpg (Filesize: 56.70 KB) |
Eiko | Jan 24, 2013 12:21 pm |
---|---|
Subject: Re: Is Landing Pad the only building that "breaks" connectors Thanks for testing, Sal I still think, it would be better to prevent building of a pad under a connector. Nobody wants to split up a connector line on purpose. And even if he wants it, he can remove the connector with 2 clicks (connectors doesn't leave debris, so no problem) and then build the pad. Anyone against this? And why? |
Sal | Jan 24, 2013 12:38 pm |
---|---|
Subject: Re: Is Landing Pad the only building that "breaks" connectors Although I am a hardcore original M.A.X. freak, that was never good in this game, but would not hesitate to give his first two kidz for its multiplayer full functioning capabilities away... I also think it should be prevented to build a landing pad under a connector. A nice warning/message explaining the issue while a player wants to build a landing pad under a connector, could be a nice workaround too. Either way... This landing pad has a weird concept, somehow not very compatible in the whole universe of M.A.X. |
corwin90 | Jan 24, 2013 3:24 pm |
---|---|
Subject: Re: Is Landing Pad the only building that "breaks" connectors Thank you for the replies. Wow! I'm surprised to hear a concrete block counts as a connector. I would have guessed it to be like a road/bridge/water platform. |